[Slapt-get-user] Sources with different priority?

Jason Woodward woodwardj at jaos.org
Mon Apr 25 09:55:47 EDT 2005


Hi Eugene,

> Wouldn't the last command overwrite gsb packages with the those that
> have higher version in official distribution?

Not if you have the gsb packages excluded in your default rc.

> Wouldn't a number of packages be first "upgraded" by second command,
> then downloaded again and "downgraded to normal" by third?

Not if you exclude vanilla slackware packages in your linuxpackages rc with:

EXCLUDE=/slackware/[a-z]+/$

> Also, if I understand right, --reinstall
> would reinstall a whole bunch of packages, which is rather time-consuming.

Only those packages you requested that you wanted no matter if it was a lesser version or not.
 I meant this on a package by package basis.

> In my opinion, prioritizing from within slapt-getrc is more appropriate,
> because the decision about which packages are "better" is left to the
> user rather than the package maintainer.  Some people may want to
> override official packages with custom "cutting edge" ones, others may not.

I can see that as being desirable.

> Initially, I thought about prioritizing by regexp (like "anything that
> has 'frg' in the name has priority over everything else"), but that
> would not fit in situation when some site carry packages that are not
> easily distinguishable by their name.

But that would work if  you segregated your package sources into seperate rc files.  So even
those packages w/o clear naming could be sandboxed in by slapt-get only knowing of that
sourcese packages at that time.

> I understand that my proposal has its limitations too, but IMHO it would
> be fitting in many practical cases.  It also should be quite easy to
> implement, by just adding one more step in the sorting algorithm.

Let me know if you come up with a patch for this.  I'm short on free time at the moment.


take care,
jason

--
Jason Woodward
woodwardj at jaos.org

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
 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=4p8c
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

my($c, at s)=(0,qw( | / - \ ));$|++;my$p;&{sub{map{$p.=chr$_}
unpack(join('a',('',split(//,$_->[1]))),$_->[0]);}}foreach
[qw/74117115116 2333/],[qw/65110111116104101114 2333333/],
[qw/80101114108 2333/],[qw/729799107101114 222333/];{my$z=
$c<4?$s[$c++]:$s [$c=0];printf"\ec%s%s%s",$z,$p,$z,select*
STDOUT,*STDOUT,*STDOUT,0.1,;redo;}##########JAPH##########



More information about the Slapt-get-user mailing list