[Slapt-get-devel] slapt-get 0.9.9h
Dan Barber
danb at mojolin.com
Sun Feb 13 18:23:59 EST 2005
yep. it changed the perms. Here is my root dir:
drwx------ 21 root root 4096 Feb 13 18:25 .
drwx------ 21 root root 4096 Feb 13 18:25 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 4096 Feb 13 16:26 bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 6 1997 boot
drwxr-xr-x 15 root root 40960 Mar 13 1994 dev
drwx------ 57 root root 8192 Feb 13 18:25 etc
drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 Sep 18 18:49 home
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 13 16:28 lib
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Jan 11 16:49 lost+found
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Mar 16 2002 mnt
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Dec 18 20:14 opt
drwxr-xr-x 101 root root 0 Oct 6 1997 proc
drwx------ 30 root root 4096 Oct 6 1997 root
drwxr-xr-x 2 root bin 8192 Sep 18 21:54 sbin
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jan 11 16:50 storage
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 12 2004 sys
drwxrwxrwt 17 root root 4096 Feb 13 18:25 tmp
drwx------ 18 root root 4096 Feb 13 14:04 usr
drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Sep 11 23:49 var
It looks like /etc and /usr are affected.
Dan
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Michel Hermier wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2005 23:10, Dan Barber wrote:
> > I'm on 10.1 with slapt-get 9.9h now and everything is working as expected.
> > it seemed to be affected only during the install.
>
> The problem is that it must not be the last package, because other package
> will correct the directories rights. Because other package have the corrects
> ones. if you try to reinstall it now without anything else you'll see the
> problem showing up again.
> Which source are you using? because it seems only current and 10.1 are
> affected. If in your slaptget-rc you still use 10.0 source you won't see the
> problem.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Slapt-get-devel mailing list
> Slapt-get-devel at software.jaos.org
> http://software.jaos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/slapt-get-devel
>
More information about the Slapt-get-devel
mailing list